Examining The Impact of AI and Internet Ubiquity on Human Overthinking and Decision-Making Latency: An Empirical Study on Digital Overstimulation and Cognitive Rumination

Authors

  • Yash Srivastav D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author
  • Shivani Singh D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author
  • Saroj Kumar D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author
  • Brijesh Kumar Pal D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author
  • Kumar Sandeep D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author
  • Kamini Prajapati D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author
  • Amita Singh D.K.R.R Pharmacy College, Amberpur, Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh), India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64474/3139-1559.Vol2.Issue1.7
Search on Google Scholar

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Digital Overstimulation, Cognitive Rumination, Decision-Making Latency, Internet Ubiquity, Overthinking, Cognitive Load, AI Dependency

Abstract

The presence of artificial intelligence (AI) and internet technologies has brought about a tremendous change in terms of human cognition and decision-making processes. Exposures of individuals to AI enabled digital environments, online multitasking and internet use in general have raised questions with respect to cognitive overload, overthinking, and decision-making delay. This research project aims at investigating the effect of the AI phenomenon and the internet on digital overstimulation, cognitive ruminations, and decision-making delay in human subjects within the age range of 18 to 45 years. Quantitative methods will be employed involving tests and measures such as correlation and ANOVA. The findings indicate a strong positive correlation between digital overstimulation, dependency on AI, cognitive rumination, and delayed decision-making. This study suggests that excessive digital activities are a major source of mental exhaustion, recurring thought processes, and reduced cognitive efficiency. These findings show the importance of practicing digital balance and proper use of AI in today’s world.

References

1. Ahmed, S. Y., & Pardaev, J. (2025). Human-AI decision dynamics: how risk propensity and trust impact choices through decision fatigue, conditional on AI understanding. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 8(2), 96-113.

2. Angage, P. (2025). Combating decision fatigue and optimising decision-making in Information Technology (IT): The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing cognitive outcomes for IT professionals.

3. El Hage, S. (2025). Minds Growing Under Algorithmic Influence The Cognitive Price of Growing Up with AI and What It will Cost Our Future.

4. Fanti Rovetta, F. (2025). Scaffolded rumination: the case of problematic smartphone use. Topoi, 44(2), 419-430.

5. Fedorets, V. M., Klochko, O. V., Tverdokhlib, I. A., & Sharyhin, O. A. (2024, October). Cognitive aspects of interaction in the “Human—Artificial Intelligence” system. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2871, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.

6. Gao, F., & Du, X. (2025). A meta-analysis of rumination and digital addiction. Personality and individual differences, 238, 113074.

7. JAIN, S., & DANGI, D. (2025). Youth, Social Media, And Digital Overstimulation: A Systematic Literature Review And Bibliometric Analysis Of Psychological And Behavioural Effects. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S7 (2025): Posted 10 October), 2206-2222.

8. Malan, J. J. (2019). The influence of digital distraction on cognitive load, attention conflict and meeting productivity.

9. Riley, C., Al-Refai, O., Reyes, Y. C., & Hammad, E. (2025). Human-AI Interactions: Cognitive, Behavioral, and Emotional Impacts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17753.

10. Rodrig, L., & Marlow, L. (2025). Cognitive Load Management in Digital Learning Environments: Implications for Student Performance. Innovative Journal of Educational Research and Insights, 188-197.

11. Siemens, G., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Gabriel, F., Medeiros, K., Marrone, R., Joksimovic, S., & De Laat, M. (2022). Human and artificial cognition. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100107.

12. Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 34(1), 171-196.

13. Surbakti, R., Umboh, S. E., Pong, M., & Dara, S. (2024). Cognitive load theory: Implications for instructional design in digital classrooms. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 483-493.

14. Van Arum, S., Genç, H. U., Reidsma, D., & Karahanoğlu, A. (2025, April). Selective trust: understanding human-AI partnerships in personal health decision-making process. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-21).

15. Wu, J. Y., & Xie, C. (2018). Using time pressure and note-taking to prevent digital distraction behavior and enhance online search performance: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 244-254.

sd

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06

How to Cite

Srivastav, Y. S., Singh, S. S., Kumar, S. K., Pal, B. K. P., Sandeep, K. S., Prajapati, K. P., & Singh, A. S. (2026). Examining The Impact of AI and Internet Ubiquity on Human Overthinking and Decision-Making Latency: An Empirical Study on Digital Overstimulation and Cognitive Rumination. Research Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Insights (RJAMI), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.64474/3139-1559.Vol2.Issue1.7